First, a disclaimer: In this post, I'm using the term schizophrenia in a way that is technically incorrect. In my thinking for this particular subject, I'm using schizophrenia to mean 'cognitive dissonance or emotional conflict to the point that one feels as if one is experiencing a mental disorder characterized by multiple and conflicting personalities.' This is a gray area in terms of offensive language, and I'm sensitive to the way our culture demonizes and marginalizes persons experiencing mental illness. If anyone is offended by my use of this word in this way, I sincerely apologize and I hope you'll let me know about your experience (and educate me in the process).
It's a weird time of year to be a progressive Christian. Religion is in the air. Saturday night, the kids were heading to bed. I remarked to DH, "Gee I bet we could find an annoyingly literalist report on Jesus on the History Channel to watch tonight..." I think we opted for Law & Order reruns instead.
So what is the source of this weirdness, that seems to reach a fever pitch during Holy Week - to the extent that I feel a little schizophrenic?
1) A general lack of awareness among secular folks that there's more than one way to be a person of faith. I have many interesting and fun discussions with my non-churchy friend A about this kind of thing. We were lunching a couple of weeks ago and she asked me what I had given up for Lent. Now I appreciate the observation of Lent, as a period of reflection and individual & corporate confession, but I don't necessarily incorporate a Lenten discipline. If you do and it feeds your soul, please continue. But I could see the wheels turning in the head of my friend. It seemed that she was thinking something along these lines, "You read theology, you attend church, you work at a church for God's sake (so to speak)... of course you give up something for Lent." I hope that our friendship allows her to glimpse a third path - not secular, not rule-following, exclusivist religion, but something else. We'll see.
2. An internal debate (and communal, in some progressive faith communities) about the meaning of the Resurrection. This is the heart of the matter, at least for me. I don't think it's possible to overemphasize the wondrous treasure of Resurrection as metaphor - and the beauty of this metaphor at work in the world, a gift from Christian faith. Resurrection means that God / Final Reality / Mysterious Love has the last word. No matter how bleak and hopeless any situation or individual life appears, the future is open. Resurrection-as-metaphor has real power. But what actually happened? For many progressive folks, just asking the question goes down the wrong path. But maybe these good folks aren't called upon to answer the questions of children. At our Palm Sunday weekend children's education sleepover, we told the story of Jesus' last week. Here was the comment about Easter morning, "So Jesus is like a zombie, but without the brain-eating." Hilarious, and of course, laughter and mayhem are always prime goals for 10 year old boys, but a real question remains. I don't believe that the lifeless corpse of Jesus was resuscitated, but I believe that SOMETHING happened. That SOMETHING turned a somewhat bumbling and inept group of disciples into the greatest evangelical force the world has ever seen. I am content with the mystery, but it does contribute to my feeling of schizophrenia when we announce 'He is risen, indeed.'
3. A recognition that nontheist faith is gratifying intellectually but feels cold. What I would call classical nontheism (think I just invented that - LOL), is a God that is nonpersonal, without intention, and unconscious. This is Bultmann's 'Mysterious Reality.' I have described myself as a nontheist before (althoughI tend to pray like a theist, but that's a subject for another post). Can I reach for and begin to describe a nontheist faith that still has room for intention, compassion, and direction? If nontheism tells us that God is not a Being even a Supreme Being, but is instead Being Itself (Tillich's Ground of Being), then can Being Itself - the Universe - have a direction that bends however long toward peace and unity? If scientist and sociologists are pondering humanity's bent toward compassion (check out this fun and hopeful video on Empathic Civilization http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7AWnfFRc7g), can theologians even and especially amateur ones ponder an Empathic Universe?
Peace to you.